Smith v. Devine

Plaintiff: Courtney Lamont Smith
Defendant: Thomas B Devine, III
Case Number: 4:2011cv00703
Filed: September 26, 2011
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 8, 2011 5 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT re 4 Order Dismissing Case without prejudice denying the relief sought. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 11/8/11. (kpr)
October 4, 2011 2 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing the Clerk to forward to plaintiff an ifp application, calculation sheet, and certificate. Plaintiff is directed to submit either the $350 statutory filing fee or a completed ifp application within 30 days after the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/4/11. (kpr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Devine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtney Lamont Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas B Devine, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?