Cook v. Triple Transport Inc

Plaintiff: Patricia Cook
Defendant: Triple Transport Inc
Case Number: 4:2012cv00249
Filed: April 25, 2012
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Faulkner
Presiding Judge: Kristine G. Baker
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 1, 2013 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 18 Motion to Strike 17 Response to Motion. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/1/13. (kpr)
December 19, 2012 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 8 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice. Eric E. Wolfgang is added as counsel of record for defendant. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/19/12. (kpr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook v. Triple Transport Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Triple Transport Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Cook
Represented By: Boyd A. Tackett, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?