Hare v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
| Ruth Ann Hare |
| L'Oreal USA Long Term Disability Plan, Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and L'Oreal USA Inc |
| 4:2013cv00087 |
| February 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal-ERISA |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER applauding the parties' efforts in regards to the settlement. If the parties need any further relief, they should first move to reopen. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/8/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 34 Motion for Attorney Fees. Defendants shall pay Hare and her lawyer the agreed-upon amount by February 14, 2014. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/16/14. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss Hare's breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/18/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
12
ERISA SCHEDULING ORDER: Parties directed to file administrative record within 45 days of this order; Plaintiff's motion for judgment and brief due 21 calendar days after stipulated record is filed; Defendant's response to motion and brief due 21 calendar days after Plaintiff's brief is filed.. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/11/2013. (mkf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
