McCurry v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Division of the State of Arkansas
Robert McCurry |
Alcoholic Beverage Control Division of the State of Arkansas |
4:2013cv00467 |
August 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Benton |
D. P. Marshall |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McCurry v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Division of the State of Arkansas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Alcoholic Beverage Control Division of the State of Arkansas | |
Represented By: | Mindy D. Pipkin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert McCurry | |
Represented By: | Christopher Woodard |
Represented By: | Jim Lyons |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.