Tramel v. Superior Graphite Co

Plaintiff: William Keith Tramel
Defendant: Superior Graphite Co
Case Number: 4:2013cv00502
Filed: August 28, 2013
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Pope
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 5, 2015 46 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 45 Opinion and Order entered in this matter on this date, the Court hereby dismisses plaintiff's 1 complaint. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/5/2015. (ks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tramel v. Superior Graphite Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Keith Tramel
Represented By: Hugh Richardson Laws
Represented By: Norbert A. Fleck, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superior Graphite Co
Represented By: Edward N. Druck
Represented By: Everett Clarke Tucker, IV
Represented By: Mark S. Wilkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?