Thomas v. Chandler et al
| Kataka Nigel Thomas |
| Chad Pruett, Jessica Chandler, David Stone and James Spaul |
| 4:2013cv00665 |
| November 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Izard |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
JUDGMENT : Pursuant to the 34 Order entered in this matter on this date, it is Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that this case be, and it is hereby, dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 12/05/2014. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS except as to Defendant James Spaul. The Clerk of the Court is directed to prepare a summons for Defendant James Spaul and the U S Marshal is directed to serve a copy of 5 Amended Complaint and summons on Defendant without prepayment or security of fees and costs. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 01/28/2014. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the Amended Complaint and summons on defendants Jessica Chandler and Chad Pruett in care of the Faulkner County Detention Center, 500 German Lane, Conway, AR 72034-7014, without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/13/14. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
