Jordan v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Gail Jordan
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 4:2014cv00068
Filed: February 7, 2014
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Yell
Presiding Judge: Jerome T. Kearney
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 6, 2015 15 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 14 Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this day, judgment is entered for plaintiff Gail Jordan. The final decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is reversed, and this proceeding is remanded pursuant to "sentence four." Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 07/06/2015. (rhm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jordan v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gail Jordan
Represented By: Laura J. McKinnon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Stacey Elise McCord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?