Williford v. Faulkner County Detention Center et al
| Richard E Williford |
| Faulkner County Detention Center, Does and Hasson |
| 4:2014cv00461 |
| August 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Faulkner |
| Beth Deere |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING 31 Recommended Disposition. Mr. Willifords lawsuit is DISMISSED, without prejudice. All pending motions are denied, as moot. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 10/2/2015. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 16 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND PARTIAL RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION in all respects; dismissing Mr. Williford's claims against the "Doe" defendants without prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action would be frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 02/11/2015. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER adopting 5 Partial Recommended Disposition in all respects. Mr. Williford's claims against the Faulkner County Detention Center are DISMISSED with prejudice. His claim against Defendant Hasson in his official capacity is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 9/15/2014. (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
