Controllable On-Site Protection Security Systems Inc v. Telular Corporation
Plaintiff:
Controllable On-Site Protection Security Systems Inc
Defendant:
Telular Corporation
Case Number:
4:2014cv00487
Filed:
August 20, 2014
Court:
Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office:
Little Rock Office
County:
Saline
Presiding Judge:
James M. Moody
Nature of Suit:
Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action:
28:1441
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Controllable On-Site Protection Security Systems Inc v. Telular Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Controllable On-Site Protection Security Systems Inc | |
| Represented By: | Scott E. Poynter |
| Represented By: | Corey Darnell McGaha |
| Represented By: | John G. Emerson, Jr. |
| Represented By: | William Thomas Crowder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Telular Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin D. Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
