Wofford v. Holladay et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 14, 2016
ORDER approving and adopting 36 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Defendant J. Smith; and certifying pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/14/2016. (mef)
|May 3, 2016
ORDER that Plaintiff should provide a viable address at which service for Defendant J. Smith may be attempted within 15 days of this order's entry. If he fails to do so, the Court will recommend Defendant Smith's dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 5/3/2016. (lej)
|April 21, 2016
ORDER adopting the partial recommended disposition of United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe 8 ; plaintiff's claims against defendants Doc Holladay, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Bennett, Allen, Trammel and Brawley are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/21/16. (tjb)
|April 4, 2016
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons and the USM to serve Defendants Ouzit, Smith, Mitchell, and Landreth without prepayment of fees or costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/4/2016. (lej)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?