Hamilton v. Foster et al
Ted Hamilton |
Melanie Jones Foster and Rory L Griffin |
4:2016cv00243 |
May 5, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Izard |
Brian S. Miller |
Joe J. Volpe |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER adopting in their entirety 49 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing plaintiff Ted Hamilton's claim against defendant Melanie Jones Foster in her official capacity; granting 46 Jones Foster's motion or summary judgm ent as to Hamilton's claim against her in her personal capacity ; dismissing this case, with prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from the order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/25/2017. (kdr) |
Filing 37 ORDER adopting the 24 Partial Report and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe denying 14 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/12/16. (tjb) |
Filing 6 ORDER adopting 4 the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition; and dismissing, with prejudice, defendant Rory Griffin; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/7/2016. (kdr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.