Green v. Grigsdie et al
Rickie Green |
Marge Grigsdie, McCoy, J Staley, Caldwell, Langley, Huette, Peyton, Lanius, Cook, Parnell, Doe, Gwendolyn E Hart and Clark |
4:2016cv00516 |
July 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Izard |
Brian S. Miller |
J. Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER adopting in its entirety 56 the partial recommended disposition; and granting in part and denying in part 42 defendants' motion for partial summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/6/2018. (kdr) |
Filing 12 ORDER adopting the 11 recommended disposition; dismissing without prejudice Green's claims against Staley, Lanius, Cook, Hart, and Doe; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Green may proceed with his inadequate medical care, equal protection, excessive force, failure to protect, and battery claims against Defendants Grigsdie, McCoy, Caldwell, Langley, Huette, Peyton, Parnell and Clark. The clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Grigsdie, McCoy, Caldwell, Langley, Huette, Peyton, Parnell, and Clark and the U.S. Marshal to serve the summons, substituted complaint, and this order on them without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/17/2016. (ljb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.