Bilal v. Progressive Home Owners & Auto Insurance Company et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 2, 2016
ORDER directing the Clerk to issue summons to Progressive. The Court directs the U.S. Marshal to serve the complaint and summons by certified mail, restricted delivery, with a return receipt requested, without prepayment of fees, to Progressive's President. All claims against Ameriprise are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/2/2016. (jak)
|October 14, 2016
ORDER granting 1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Bilal must pay $100 on the first day of every month, beginning 11/1/2016, until the total $400 fee is paid in full. Bilal's complaint does state a claim under 42 U.S.C. 1981 for u nequal treatment based on race in a contractual relationship. That one claim goes forward. Bilal's embedded request for a lawyer, 2 at 3, is denied without prejudice. The Court directs Bilal to provide the names and addresses of the registered agents for Progressive and Ameriprise by 11/1/2016. Bilal must familiarize himself with this Court's Local Rules and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/14/2016. (jak)
|September 29, 2016
ORDER: The Court needs more information before it can rule on the 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is directed to answer the questions contained within this order by 10/7/2016. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/29/2016. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?