McCoy v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Arkansas Eastern District McCoy v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

McCoy v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Plaintiff:	Bobbie McCoy
Defendant:	Department of Housing and Urban Development
Case Number:	4:2017cv00002
Filed:	January 3, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office:	Little Rock Office
County:	Pulaski
Presiding Judge:	Kristine G. Baker
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 4, 2019	Filing 31 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 30 Order entered in this matter on this date, judgment is entered in favor of defendant Dr. Ben S. Carson Sr. in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development on plaintiff Bobbie McCoy's claims. Mr. McCoy's claims are dismissed with prejudice; the relief requested is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/4/2019. (jbh)
November 25, 2019	Filing 28 ORDER granting 27 the parties' joint motion to extend time to file trial briefs; removing this case from the trial calendar for the week of 12/16/2019; suspending all currently pending pretrial deadlines; and taking under advisement 17 motion for summary judgment. The Court will enter a new trial date and amended scheduling order by separate order, if necessary, after the Court rules on the pending motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/25/2019. (jbh)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 4, 2019

Filing 31 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 30 Order entered in this matter on this date, judgment is entered in favor of defendant Dr. Ben S. Carson Sr. in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development on plaintiff Bobbie McCoy's claims. Mr. McCoy's claims are dismissed with prejudice; the relief requested is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/4/2019. (jbh)

November 25, 2019

Filing 28 ORDER granting 27 the parties' joint motion to extend time to file trial briefs; removing this case from the trial calendar for the week of 12/16/2019; suspending all currently pending pretrial deadlines; and taking under advisement 17 motion for summary judgment. The Court will enter a new trial date and amended scheduling order by separate order, if necessary, after the Court rules on the pending motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/25/2019. (jbh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bobbie McCoy
Represented By:	Austin Porter, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Housing and Urban Development
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?