Crook v. Thrice et al
Stephen Arnold Crook |
Thrice, Roy Griffin, Jones and V Mullins |
4:2017cv00327 |
May 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Pulaski |
Beth Deere |
James M. Moody |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER Adopting 39 Report and Recommendations.The Defendants' 34 and 36 Motions to Dismiss are granted. Mr. Crook's claims are dismissed, without prejudice, based on his failure to prosecute and to respond to the Court's 2/28/2018 Order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/17/2018. (mcz) |
Filing 33 ORDER adopting 32 Partial Recommended Disposition. Defendant Griffin's 30 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted in part and denied in part. Mr. Crook's claims for money damages against Defendant Griffin in his official capacity are dismissed, with prejudice. Mr. Crook may proceed on his claims against Defendant Griffin in his individual capacity. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/28/2017. (mcz) |
Filing 27 ORDER approving and adopting 26 Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety; granting in part and denying in part 20 Medical Defendants' motion for summary judgment; and dismissing, without prejudice, Mr. Crook's claims against Defendant Mullins. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/20/2017. (cmn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.