Porter v. Huffman et al
| Nicholas Ray Porter |
| Scott Huffman, Faulkner County Detention Facility and Andrews |
| 4:2017cv00484 |
| July 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Faulkner |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Beth Deere |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 61 Order entered this date, and this Court's prior 19 , 27 Orders, plaintiff Nicholas Ray Porter's claims against defendants are dismissed. The relief requested is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/23/2020. (jbh)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 33 Motion for reconsideration. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Mr. Porter a copy of each paper he has filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 7/15/2019. (jak)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER adopting 19 Partial Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice plaintiff Nicholas Porter's claims of overcrowding, access-to-the-courts, and retaliation; dismissing with prejudice Mr. Porter's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Faulkner County Detention Center; dismissing the Faulkner County Detention Center as a party to this action; and denying as moot 26 Mr. Porter's motion for status update. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/17/2019. (cmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
