Watkins v. Holladay
| Henry Watkins |
| Doc Holladay, Briggs, Brawley, Musaddiq, Buckner, Routh and Pulaski County Sheriff's Office |
| 4:2018cv00605 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff's second amended complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted #10 . Dismissal of this action count as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/15/2018. (lej)
|
| Filing 10 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against all Defendants filed by Henry Watkins.(cel) (Docket text modified on 10/10/2018 to correct the description of the document filed) (jak) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #10 Amended Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description of the document filed as "SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT" as marked on the document. (jak) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit #5 . If Plaintiff wishes to further amend his allegations, he may complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, mark it as "Second Amended Complaint," and file within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's amended complaint, as it now stands, is deficient and may be dismissed after 30 days. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/1/2018. (lej)
|
|
Filing 8
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying the motion for service #7 . Plaintiff's amended complaint must first be screened. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 9/27/2018. (lej)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Service by Henry Watkins. (cel) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against all Defendants filed by Henry Watkins. (cel) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Henry Watkins. (cel) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that each Plaintiff must submit either: (1) the statutory filing fee of $400; or (2) a properly completed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit, with the required calculation sheet signed by an authorized official of the detention center at which he or she is confined, within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/30/2018. (lej)
|
|
Filing 3
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction #2 . Plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed without paying a filing fee and affidavit of indigence or paid a filing fee. Plaintiff may renew the motion for injunctive relief after the case is properly filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/30/2018. (lej)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Henry Watkins.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Doc Holladay, filed by Henry Watkins.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
