Mallard v. Phillips et al
| Joe Mallard |
| Monte Munyan, Gary Stewart and Phillips |
| 4:2019cv00123 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ADDENDUM to #5 Amended Complaint filed by Joe Mallard. (ljb) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Joe Mallard. (ljb) |
Filing 4
ORDER directing the Clerk to mail Mallard a 1983 complaint form that is labeled "Amended Complaint;" and directing Mallard to file, within 30 days of the date of this Order, an Amended Complaint that complies with the instructions in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/25/2019. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 IFP motion; directing monthly payments be collected from Plaintiff's institutional account, until a total of $350 has been paid to the Clerk; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Ouachita River Unit and the appropriate ADC offices. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/20/2019. (kdr)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Joe Mallard.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joe Mallard. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
