Coastal Metal Works LLC v. Huffman Construction LLC et al
Coastal Metal Works LLC |
Huffman Construction LLC and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland |
4:2019cv00875 |
December 6, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Miller Act |
40 U.S.C. ยง 270 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER:Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 3/13/2020; Rule 26(f) Report due by 3/27/2020. Proposed Bench Trial set sometime during the week of 2/16/2021 at 9:15 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 4A before Judge James M. Moody Jr. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 1/31/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Final Scheduling Order)(kog) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE re #10 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1), #11 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) Response to 12(B)(6) and Other Motions of Huffman Construction, LLC and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland by Coastal Metal Works LLC (Cross, Junius) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to #12 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim Answer to Counterclaim by Coastal Metal Works LLC.(Cross, Junius) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #10 and #11 Corporate Disclosure Statement. CORRECTION: The docket texts were modified to correct the filing parties as indicated on the documents. (kbc) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland.(Willis, Matthew) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Coastal Metal Works LLC by Huffman Construction LLC.(Willis, Matthew) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (Willis, Matthew) Docket text modified on 1/14/2020 to correct filing party. (kbc) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Huffman Construction LLC (Willis, Matthew) Docket text modified on 1/14/2020 to correct filing party. (kbc) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants (Willis, Matthew) |
Filing 7 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court notifying party that #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer lacks an attorney's address, telephone number, Bar number, and email address (General Order 53) and does not contain a statement that the movant contacted the adverse party with regard to the motion (Local Rule 6.2(b)). (jak) |
Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants (Willis, Matthew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Wayne Willis on behalf of All Defendants (Willis, Matthew) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Miller Act Complaint Proof of Service - Summons and Complaint upon Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, filed by Coastal Metal Works LLC. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland served on 12/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Cross, Junius) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Joel Franklin Hoover on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Hoover, Joel) |
Summons Reissued due to clerical error as to Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and returned to counsel for service. (fjg) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Coastal Metal Works LLC. (jbh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Coastal Metal Works LLC. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $400 paid; Receipt Number LIT075132.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.