Wolfe et al v. Affordable Rooter Service LLC et al
| Steve Nicholas and Tyler Wolfe |
| Brent Bogan and Affordable Rooter Service LLC |
| 4:2020cv00156 |
| February 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steve Nicholas. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service - Brent Bogan)(Hamlet, Lydia) |
| Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 6/1/2020 and Jury Trial set for 5/17/2021 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom #2A before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 3/11/2020. (hml) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Affordable Rooter Service LLC (Wakefield, Samuel) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Affordable Rooter Service LLC, Brent Bogan.(Wakefield, Samuel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel Brent Wakefield on behalf of Affordable Rooter Service LLC, Brent Bogan (Wakefield, Samuel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Tyler Wolfe, Steve Nicholas. (Fee $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT076071.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
