Hatley v. Patiala Express Inc et al
Ramona Leigh Hatley |
Mubashar Ishaq and Patiala Express Inc |
4:2020cv00261 |
March 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER:Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 7/9/2020; Rule 26(f) Report due by 7/23/2020. Proposed Jury Trial set sometime during the week of 5/17/2021 at 9:15 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 4A before Judge James M. Moody Jr. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 4/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Final Scheduling Order)(kog) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Patiala Express Inc (Comstock, Christina) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Mubashar Ishaq, Patiala Express Inc.(Comstock, Christina)(Docket text modified on 3/12/2020 to remove reference to the Jury demand) (jak) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #3 Answer. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to remove reference to the Jury demand. (jak) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Ramona Leigh Hatley.(bmd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by All Defendants from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number 60CV-20-1645. Fee $400 received, receipt number LIT076447. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.