Neeley v. Kelley et al
Jonathan Neeley |
Dexter Payne, Benny Magness, Tyronne Broomfield, Wendy Kelley, Whitney Gass, John Felts, Bobby Glover, Jerry Bradshaw, Buddy Chadick, Asa Hutchinson and William Byers |
4:2020cv00442 |
April 21, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Kristine G Baker |
Joe J Volpe |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to George Kendall re #1 Class Action Complaint, #2 Notice of Docket Correction re #1 Class Action Complaint. (fjg) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cases associated. Create association to 4:20-cv-00434-KGB-JJV, per #2 Order. (jbh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Class Action Complaint. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (wrong case number on document) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #1 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against All Defendants, filed by Jonathan Neeley. Fee of $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT076913. Summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/21/2020: #2 Main Document - Correct) (jak). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.