Woods v. Samsung Electronics of America Inc et al
| Myia Woods |
| John Doe Corporations and Samsung Electronics of America Inc |
| 4:2020cv00706 |
| June 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER:Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 8/12/2020; Rule 26(f) Report due by 8/26/2020. Proposed Jury Trial set sometime during the week of 6/21/2021 at 9:15 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 4A before Judge James M. Moody Jr. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 6/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Final Scheduling Order)(kog) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Samsung Electronics of America Inc (Robertson, James) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Samsung Electronics of America Inc. (jbh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Samsung Electronics of America Inc, filed by Myia Woods. (jbh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Samsung Electronics of America Inc from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number 60CV-20-02641. Fee of $400 paid; receipt number LIT077509. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
