Pennington v. Watson et al
Frederick Pennington, Jr |
Dexter Payne, R Watson, Leslie Rutledge, Andy Shock, Herbert T Wright, Jr, James Dycus, Larry Jegley, Charonda Rushing, Terri Hollingsworth, John Felts, Asa Hutchinson, Harris, Does Members ofArkansas Board of Parole and Bradley |
4:2020cv01420 |
December 3, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Patricia S Harris |
Billy Roy Wilson |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 13 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Frederick Pennington, Jr. (ljb) |
Filing 12 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jbh) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 9 MOTION for Permission to Amend by Frederick Pennington, Jr. (kdr) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Frederick Pennington, Jr.(kdr) |
![]() |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #2 Complaint by Frederick Pennington, Jr. (llg) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint and for Preliminary Injunction by Frederick Pennington, Jr. (llg) |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Frederick Pennington, Jr. (kdr) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Frederick Pennington, Jr.(kdr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Frederick Pennington, Jr. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.