Ousley et al v. Mitchell et al
| Braylin Jacorey Ousley and Anaka Njeri Smith |
| Schott Transportation Inc and Gerald Lawrence Mitchell |
| 4:2021cv00148 |
| February 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Summons Issued as to Gerald Lawrence Mitchell and returned to counsel for plaintiffs. (jap) |
| Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Report due by 6/2/2021 and Jury Trial set for 6/13/2022 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock, Arkansas Courtroom #2A before Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 3/12/2021. (hml) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Gerald Lawrence Mitchell, Schott Transportation Inc.(Fairley, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by John Carter Fairley on behalf of Gerald Lawrence Mitchell, Schott Transportation Inc (Fairley, John) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Braylin Jacorey Ousley, Anaka Njeri Smith.(ajt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Gerald Lawrence Mitchell, Schott Transportation Inc from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number 60CV-21-1029. Fee $402 paid, receipt number LIT080988. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
