Hampton v. Freeman
Plaintiff: Alonzo Hampton
Defendant: William IV Freeman and William Freeman, IV
Case Number: 4:2021cv00531
Filed: June 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Kristine G Baker
Referring Judge: J Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER allowing Hampton to proceed with his retaliation claim against Freeman; and directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Defendant Lieutenant William Freeman, IV; directing the USMS to serve the summons, #2 Complaint, and this Order on Freeman, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 7/30/2021. (kdr)
July 30, 2021 Summons Issued as to William Freeman, IV. Forwarded to USMS for service. (kdr)
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the ADC's Maximum Security Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralization Banking Office, and the ADC Compliance Office. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 7/26/2021. (jbh)
July 23, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alonzo Hampton. (llg)
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS denying without prejudice #1 IFP Application; directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff another IFP application, along with a copy of this Order; allowing Plaintiff 30 days to either, on or before 7/22/2021, pay the $402 filing fee or (1) complete and sign the IFP application; (2) have an authorized prison official complete and sign the prisoner account statement and calculation sheet; and (3) return all forms to the Clerk; and directing prison officials to assist in completing the necessary forms. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 6/22/2021. (kdr)
June 22, 2021 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the party name as "William Freeman, IV" as indicated on the document. (cmn)
June 21, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against William Freeman, IV, filed by Alonzo Hampton.(kdr) (Docket text modified on 6/22/2021 to correct party name.)(cmn)
June 21, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alonzo Hampton. (kdr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hampton v. Freeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William IV Freeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Freeman, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alonzo Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?