Martin v. Dean et al
| Esker Martin, III |
| Dean and Hill |
| 4:2021cv00620 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #2 Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Objections are due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 08/24/2021. (lmc) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice #1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; directing Plaintiff to submit either the $402 statutory filing fee or a completed in forma pauperis application, with the required calculation sheet signed by an authorized official of the prison, within 30 days of the entry date of this Order; and directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff an in forma pauperis application and calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 07/19/2021. (ajt)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Esker Martin, III. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Esker Martin, III. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
