Baty v. Higgins et al
| Arvol Baty |
| Eric Higgins, Rose, Allen and Newburn |
| 4:2021cv01001 |
| October 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Baty's motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order to the Pulaski County Sheriff; directing the Clerk of Court to send a blank 1983 complaint form to Baty; and directing Baty to file and Amended complaint within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 11/22/2021. (llg)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arvol Baty. (ldb) |
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk to enclose an IFP application and a copy of this order; and directing Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 11/2/2021. (jbh)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Arvol Baty.(cmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
