Richardson v. Payne et al
| Angela Schuncey Richardson |
| Dexter Payne, Keith Waddle, Toni Bradley, John Herrington, Doe and Raymond Naylor |
| 4:2022cv00160 |
| February 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Angela Schuncey Richardson.(kdr) |
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS granting #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court assesses an initial partial filing fee of $77.90. Plaintiff's custodian is directed to collet the initial partial filing fee and forward future monthly payments to the Clerk of Court until a total of $350 has been paid. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the McPherson Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralization Bank Office, and the ADC Compliance Office. Richardson is directed to amend her complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a blank 1983 complaint form to plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 2/23/2022. (jak)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Angela Schuncey Richardson.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Angela Schuncey Richardson. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
