Taylor v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
| Domeneque D Taylor |
| Credit Acceptance Corporation, Evans Motors Inc, Hood & Stacy PA, Angela Stayner and Hayden Lovelace |
| 4:2022cv00709 |
| August 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion re #18 MOTION to Compel CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS VARIOUS FILINGS filed by Credit Acceptance Corporation. (Brick, Phillip) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE by Domeneque D Taylor. (Filed pursuant to instruction from Chambers.) (kth) |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Order filed by Domeneque D Taylor. (fjg) |
| Filing 18 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION Statement - MOTION to Compel Production of Document by Domeneque D Taylor. (jap) |
| Filing 17 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #9 Motion to Compel, filed by Credit Acceptance Corporation. (Kasten, Martin) |
Filing 16
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/21/2022. (rmg)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to File by Credit Acceptance Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Brick, Phillip) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Domeneque D Taylor. (kth) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Phillip M. Brick, Jr on behalf of Credit Acceptance Corporation (Brick, Phillip) |
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Credit Acceptance Corporation (Kasten, Martin) |
| Filing 11 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court re #9 Motion notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1). (jak) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #9 MOTION to Compel. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description of the document filed as "MOTION to Compel Arbitration, Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims, or in the alternative Motion to Stay All Proceedings by Credit Acceptance Corporation" as marked on the document. (jak) |
| Filing 10 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #9 Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Credit Acceptance Corporation. (Kasten, Martin) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims, or in the alternative Motion to Stay All Proceedings by Credit Acceptance Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Kasten, Martin) (Docket text modified on 8/30/2022 to correct the description of the document filed) (jak) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Domeneque D Taylor. (kth) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re docket entries #1 - #7 . CORRECTION: The docket entries were modified to correct the file date as 8/8/2022 as marked on the documents. (jak) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #7 Second Amended Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to include reference to the Jury demand as marked on the document.(jak) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #3 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the party filer and description of the document filed as "COMPLAINT against Domeneque Taylor, filed by Credit Acceptance Corporation" as marked on the document. (jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
