Henry v. Drew County Detention Facility et al
| Lauren Elizabeth Henry |
| Drew County Detention Facility, Susan Potts and Mark Gober |
| 4:2023cv00033 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Lauren Elizabeth Henry re #5 Order. (fjg) |
Filing 5
ORDER re #4 Mail Returned. If Henry wishes to continue pursuing this lawsuit, she must within 30 days of date of this Order file notice of her current mailing address. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/17/2023. (csf)
|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Lauren Elizabeth Henry re #3 Initial Order for Pro Se Prisoners. (fjg) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to Jail Administrator of the Drew County Detention Facility. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 1/17/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Lauren Elizabeth Henry. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lauren Elizabeth Henry. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
