Barnes v. Brockman et al
| Dylan Barnes |
| Brockman, Huffman, Scott, Tim Ryals and Does Captain, "John" and "Jane,"Faulkner County Detention Center |
| 4:2023cv00260 |
| March 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff an IFP application, including the necessary certificate of inmate trust account and calculation sheet, along with a copy of this Order; directing Plaintiff to, within 30 days - on or before 5/1/2023, either: (1) pay the $402 filing fee in full; or (2) complete and sign the IFP application, have an authorized jail official complete and sign both the certificate and calculation sheet, and return the IFP application and signed forms to the Clerk; directing jail officials to assist Plaintiff in completing the necessary forms; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Faulkner County Detention Center in Conway Arkansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 3/30/2023.(kdr)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Dylan Barnes.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
