Frazier v. Smith et al
Carlos Ray Frazier |
Marshall, Johnson, Arnold, Greer, Lafayette Woods, Jr, Cobbs, Randell, Thompskin, Smith, Baker, Washington, Hawkins and Green |
4:2024cv00584 |
July 10, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending #1 Mr. Frazier's complaint be dismissed, without prejudice; and the Clerk be instructed to close this case. Objections due within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 08/22/2024. (llg) |
Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS denying #3 Motion; directing the Clerk of the Court to enclose along with a copy of this Order, a new IFP application; and directing the Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay the $405.00 filing fee within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 7/16/2024. (ldb) |
Filing 3 MOTIONS by Carlos Ray Frazier. (llg) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Calculation Sheet and Certificate of Prisoner Accounts by Carlos Ray Frazier. (llg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Carlos Ray Frazier. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.