Wilkins v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Speedy Wilkins, JR |
Union Pacific Railroad Company |
4:2024cv00738 |
August 29, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Jeremy J. Landry. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4824362. Filed by Speedy Wilkins, Jr (Lauck, Chester) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Daniel J. "Danny" Poolson, Jr.. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4824361. Filed by Speedy Wilkins, Jr (Lauck, Chester) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Carisa German-Oden. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4824360. Filed by Speedy Wilkins, Jr (Lauck, Chester) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine E. Nichols on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company (Nichols, Katherine) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Knox, Kristopher) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristopher Bruce Knox on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company (Knox, Kristopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Union Pacific Railroad Company filed by Speedy Wilkins, JR. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $405 paid. Receipt Number LIT7629.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ajj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.