Alexander/Ryahim v. Manus

Case Number: 5:2004cv00106
Filed: March 25, 2004
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Pine Bluff Office
Referring Judge: J. Thomas Ray
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 8, 2010 102 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting 100 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's 98 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is DENIED; the Court certifies that an ifp appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/8/10. (vjt)
February 11, 2010 100 Opinion or Order of the Court PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION, re docket entry # 98 MOTION to Enforce, filed by Charles Alexander/Ryahim, be denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this Recommended Disposition would not be taken in good faith. An original and one copy of an objection must be received in the office of the United States District Clerk no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 02/11/2010. (ksm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alexander/Ryahim v. Manus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?