Roberts v. Norris

Plaintiff: Brunson Roberts
Defendant: Larry Norris
Case Number: 5:2007cv00138
Filed: June 7, 2007
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Lee
Referring Judge: Henry L. Jones
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 13, 2007 2 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing the Clerk to change the style of the case to indicate Larry Norris as respondent; directing the Clerk to serve a copy of the Petition and this Order on the respondent and the Attorney General by regular mail; and directing the respondent to file a response to the petition within 20 days after service. Signed by Judge Henry L. Jones Jr. on 06/13/2007. (thd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brunson Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?