Sherman v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
| Patrick L Sherman |
| Arkansas Department of Correction and Larry Norris |
| 5:2007cv00193 |
| July 25, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| James M Moody |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
JUDGMENT in favor of Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry Norris against Patrick L Sherman pursuant to 7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M Moody on 8/8/07. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
4
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that Plaintiff's1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED, pursuant to the three-strikes provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Recommending that Plaintiff's2 Comp laint be DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Also recommending that the Court Certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an informa pauperis appeal from any Order and Judgment adopting this Recommended Disposition would not be taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 8/16/2007. Signed by Judge J. Thomas Ray on 8/1/2007. (smb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
