Miller v. Potts

Plaintiff: James W Miller
Defendant: Susan Potts
Case Number: 5:2008cv00133
Filed: May 8, 2008
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office
County: Drew
Referring Judge: Beth Deere
Presiding Judge: Susan Webber Wright
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 9, 2009 42 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT : In accordance with the findings of fact and conclusions of law announced from the bench at the conclusion of the trial in this case, Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant Susan Potts and against Plaintiff James W. Miller. The case is dismissed with prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 3/9/09. (hph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Potts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James W Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan Potts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?