Townsend v. Golden et al
| Antonio Paviese Townsend |
| Ernest Golden, J W Green, Vickie Maxwell and S Sandine |
| 5:2008cv00260 |
| September 22, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
| Arkansas |
| Jerry W. Cavaneau |
| James M. Moody |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT in favor of Ernest Golden against Antonio Paviese Townsend re 28 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/9/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that deft Golden's motion for summary judgment be granted and pltf's complt be dismissed with prejudice 20 . The Court certifies that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 3/6/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 2/20/2009. (lej)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 5 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defts Green, Maxwell and Sandine without prejudice. Service is appropriate for the remaining deft, Ernest Golden, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the original complaint with any attachments, a copy of the docket sheet and summons without prepayment of fees. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/20/08. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
