Johnson v. Adams et al
| Vincent Sharnee Johnson |
| Edward Earl Adams, Randy Morgan, Carl Johnson and Jim Hayes |
| 5:2009cv00002 |
| January 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
| Jefferson |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER ADOPTING 112 Report and Recommendations; therefore, the Motions for Summary Judgment by defts Morgan 102 and Adams 105 are granted, and pltf's complaint against these defts is dismissed. Signed by Judge Jimm Larry Hendren on 7/11/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER denying 91 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; Adopting 94 Partial Report and Recommendations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, plaintiffs motion to dismiss his appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(a) is granted. Signed by Judge Jimm Larry Hendren on 7/21/10. (dac)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER adopting in its entirety 78 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; and granting 49 Separate Defendant Carl Johnson, M.D.'s Motion for Summary Judgment; and dismissing, with prejudice, Plaintiff's Complaint against Separate Defendant Carl Johnson. Signed by Judge Jimm Larry Hendren on 3/31/10. (hph)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
