Long v. Broughton et al
| Clyde R Long |
| Broughton and Correctional Medical Services |
| 5:2009cv00015 |
| January 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
| Lee |
| Beth Deere |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
282
JUDGMENT pursuant to 281 Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered dismissing this action. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/9/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
276
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that 259 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted; recommending Plaintiff's claims against Defendant York should be dismissed without prejudice; and recommending Plaintiff's claims again st Defendant Broughton should be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 11/2/10. (hph) (Docket text modified on 11/3/2010 to correct typographical error.) (hph).
|
|
Filing
273
ORDER ADOPTING 267 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's claims against deft Toney (deceased) are dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court's Order 238 ; R L Toney terminated. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/6/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
254
ORDER ADOPTING 250 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety; therefore, Motions to Dismiss 224 243 filed by defts Roberts and Couthure are GRANTED; all claims against defts Jammie Couthure and Joyce Roberts are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/7/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
236
ORDER ADOPTING 221 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, Deft Lytle's 217 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and all claims against him are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/1/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
234
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 219 Partial Report and Recommendations; 213 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defts Roberts and Couture is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Pltf's claims against Roberts regarding her failure to provide pain medication in August 2007 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Pltf's remaining claim against Roberts and his claim against Couture continue, and the Defts' 224 Supplemental Motion to Dismiss or Partial Objections is construed solely as a motion to dismiss those remaining claims; Pltf has 14 days from the entry of this Order to file a response to said motion. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/31/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER denying 109 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/14/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING 27 Partial Report and Recommendations and denying 25 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Clyde R Long. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/2/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 24 Motion for Reconsideration of 17 Order adopting the partial recommended disposition of Judge Beth Deere. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/11/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to send plaintiff a copy of this order and a copy of the form application to proceed ifp including the certificate and account statement forms and directing plaintiff to return the application or the $350 statutory filing fee within 30 days from receipt of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 1/20/09. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
