Newton v. Norris

Plaintiff: Joe Newton
Defendant: Larry Norris
Case Number: 5:2009cv00055
Filed: February 24, 2009
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: H. David Young
Referring Judge: H. David Young
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 29, 2009 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 13 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 6/29/09. (dac)
May 28, 2009 11 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dismissing the petition with prejudice. Judgment will be entered for Norris, and all requested relief is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 5/28/2009. (lej)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newton v. Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Newton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?