Ashford et al v. Washington et al
| Charles Ashford |
| Walter Washington, J Wilson and J Giddens |
| 5:2009cv00224 |
| August 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Beth Deere |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting 3 Recommended Disposition in its entirety; therefore, pltf's complaint 2 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; pltf's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot; and pltf's motions 5 for appoinment of counsel and 6 for extension of time are DENIED; this dismissal will count as a "strike" pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g); judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/16/09. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
3
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that 2 Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice and 1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot. In addition, the Court recommends that the dismissal count as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and that the District Court certify that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 9/11/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 8/28/09. (hph)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
