Koontz v. Nroris

Plaintiff: Morris Brian Koontz
Defendant: Larry Norris
Case Number: 5:2009cv00274
Filed: August 27, 2009
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Jefferson
Referring Judge: Beth Deere
Presiding Judge: William R. Wilson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 2, 2010 33 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT pursuant to 32 Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered dismissing this habeas petition with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/2/10. (vjt)
June 28, 2010 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING pltf's 28 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Objections to R&R due 7/30/10. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/28/10. (vjt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Koontz v. Nroris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morris Brian Koontz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?