Spratt v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Roy Dean Spratt
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 5:2010cv00217
Filed: July 28, 2010
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Desha
Referring Judge: Jerry W. Cavaneau
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42:0405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 16, 2011 16 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 15 Memorandum and Order filed in this matter this date, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and the Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 8/16/2011. (srw) (Copy forwarded to ALJ.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spratt v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy Dean Spratt
Represented By: David R. Trussell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Stacey Elise McCord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?