Avery et al v. Brown et al
Chadarious Avery and Karen Walls |
Earnest E Brown, Jr, Roderick Shelby, Gerald Robinson and Jose Rivera |
5:2011cv00174 |
July 7, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Jefferson |
Brian S. Miller |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 ORDER granting 79 Motion to Dismiss Party. Claims against Sheriff Robinson, in his individual and official capacity, are dismissed with prejudice. Claims against Mr. Shelby, in his official capacity only, are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 1/10/13. (kpr) |
Filing 76 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Plainiff Karen Walls, as next friend of Chaderious Avery, a minor, against defendant Roderick Shelby in the amount of $6,002.00. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/21/2012. (dmn) |
Filing 65 ORDER granting 55 Motion in Limine; granting 56 Motion in Limine; granting 57 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/17/12. (kpr) |
Filing 60 NOTICE of Pretrial Conference set for Thursday, December 13, 2012, at 2:30 p.m. The Court will provide all counsel with call-in information by email. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/12/12. (kpr) |
Filing 47 ORDER granting 46 Motion to Dismiss Party Jose Rivera with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/9/12. (kpr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.