Clark v. Social Security Administration

Plaintiff: Charles David Clark
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 5:2011cv00230
Filed: September 7, 2011
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: J. Leon Holmes
Referring Judge: H. David Young
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 23, 2012 20 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT is entered for the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order. The complaint filed by plaintiff Charles David Clark is dismissed, and all requested relief is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 2/23/2012. (pag)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Stacey Elise McCord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles David Clark
Represented By: Mary M. Thomason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?