Aaron v. Anthony et al
| Kameon Vankeis Aaron |
| C Anthony, Grant Harris and Cashion |
| 5:2012cv00121 |
| April 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 34 Order entered in this case, Aaron's claims against Christine Anthony are dismissed with prejudice. His claims against all other Defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/12/2013. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER adopting 13 Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Aaron's claims against Defendants Cashion and Harris are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/22/2012. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons for deft Sgt. C. Anthony. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the Amended Complaint and summons on this deft in care of the ADC Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, AR 71612-0550, without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 5/7/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss Aaron's claims against all defendants--except defts Anthony, Cashion, and Grant Harris--without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/27/12. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
