McEwing v. Shores et al
| Andre D McEwing |
| J Banks, Cockrell, Hayes, J Byers, James Plummer, J Price, Newton, Rowe, F Washington, T Spencer, Hucherson, M L Drayer and Shores |
| 5:2012cv00298 |
| August 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
218
JUDGMENT dismissing without prejudice McEwing's claims against Rowe, Spencer, Moore, Jones, Poe, Johnson, Cooley, Stevens, Washington, Drayer, Ables, Shelly Byers, Newton, Price, and John Does. McEwing's claims are dismissed with prejudice against Hutcheson, Shores, Cockrell, Hayes, Banks, Allen, Jared Byers, and Plummer. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/22/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
211
ORDER granting 206 Motion to Clarify. The remaining claim against Plummer is that he denied McEwing a shower. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/23/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
203
ORDER denying 198 Motion for Continuance, denying 202 Motion to Strike. Docket number 193 , and all attachments, sealed. Recommendation 195 adopted in part and declined in part. Motion for Summary Judgment 187 granted in part and denied in part. Motion for Summary Judgment 191 granted. McEwing's claims against Spencer, Moore, Jones, Poe, Johnson, Cooley, Stevens, Washington, Drayer, Ables, Shelly Byers, and Newton are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. McEwing& #039; s property claims against Price are dismissed without prejudice. Two claims remain in this case: the property claim against Plummer; and the excessive-force claims against Hutcheson, Shores, Cockrell, Hayes, Banks, Allen, and Jared Byers. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/10/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER adopting as modified 130 Opposed Recommendation. The Court directs counsel for the Arkansas Attorney General to provide Allen's first name by 20 February 2014. For good cause, the window for serving him is reopened until 20 March 2014. All McEwing's claims against all the John Does are dismissed by agreement without prejudice. McEwing's 135 request for a hearing is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/13/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER notifying Plaintiff that he must provide identification with addresses for John Does within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/27/2013. (srw)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER directing Plaintiff to provide an address at which M. Rowe may be served within 30 days of the date of this Order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of all claims against Defendant Rowe without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 5/31/2013. (srw)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER finding service is appropriate for all Defendants; directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons for Defendants; and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of 2 , 17 , & 22 Plaintiff's Complaint and Amended Complaints with summons on Defendants without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 2/12/2013. (srw)
|
|
Filing
19
AMENDED AND SUBSTITUTED ORDER amending 18 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct; and granting 17 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint to include only Stephen Cockrell, Robert Hutchinson, Major Byers, James Plummer, Lt. Shores, and John Does. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/18/2013. (srw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
