Smith v. Johnson et al
| James Edward Smith |
| Sammy D Johnson, T Dobbs, Douglas E Boultinghouse and Justine M Minor |
| 5:2012cv00409 |
| October 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| D. P. Marshall |
| H. David Young |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER: Davis's 93 reimbursement request is allowed in full. The Court directs the Clerk to reimburse counsel and to put a copy of this Order and No. 93 in the Library Fund file maintained by the Clerk. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/14/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
91
JUDGMENT: Smith's false disciplinary claim, due process claim, and claims against Defendant Johnson are dismissed with prejudice. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/30/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER: If Smith wants to appeal, then he must either pay the $505 appellate filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, No. 84 . If the Court grants Smith permission to proceed in forma pauperis, then the $505 appellate filing fee will be deducted from his prison trust account in monthly installments. And if Smith doesn't respond to the Clerk's appellate filing fee notice by 10/30/2017, then this monthly payment schedule for the remainder of the filing fee. The Court directs Davis to take Smith a copy of this Order and to visit with him in person about the proposed pro se appeal, the pending recommendation, and the representation issue. Davis must file a status report about these issues as soon as practicable, and no later than 10/30/2017. The Court extends the time for any party to object to the recommendation until 11/15/2017. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/12/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER denying without prejudice 77 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court appointed counsel for Smith. Smith must speak to the Court only through his lawyer. 78 Motion denied as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/15/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER adopting 71 Recommendation and overruling 74 Smith's objections. 61 Motion for Summary Judgment granted. Smith's claims against Johnson will be dismissed with prejudice. The Court asks Smith to review the Arkansas law on persona l service in these circumstances and supplement his motion by 9/15/2017. If Smith's claims against Dobbs proceed to jury trial on the merits or on damages, then that trial will be on Monday, 2/26/2018. The Court will enter a Final Scheduling Order soon. The Court returns this case to Magistrate Judge Harris for further proceedings. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/25/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT re 26 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. Smith's claims against Johnson are dismissed with prejudice; his claims against Dobbs are dismissed without prejudice. The failure-to-protect and conditions-of-confinement claims against Boultinghouse and Minor are dismissed with prejudice. An ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/20/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as follow: Smith's failure to protect claims against Boltinghouse and Minor are dismissed without prejudice because he could fill the gap about their involvement by amendment; his potential conditions of confinement claim is dismissed without prejudice for the same reason; the legal defects in Smith's false-disciplinary and due-process claims cannot be fixed by amendment, and those claims are therefore dismissed with prejudice.Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/21/2012. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
